Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide and Tacrolimus for Graft-versus-Host Disease Prevention after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation from HLA-Matched Donors Has More Advantages Than Limitations.

This study compared the efficacy of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and tacrolimus (Tac) versus other regimens in 272 adults undergoing peripheral blood (PB) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) from HLA-matched donors. Of these 272 patients, 95 (34.9%) received PTCy/Tac. The times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were longer in the PTCy/Tac group (20 days versus 16 days for neutrophils and 19 days versus 12 days for platelets). The day +30 cumulative incidence (CuI) of bacterial bloodstream infection was higher in the PTCy/Tac group (43.2% versus 13.0%; P < .001). The CuIs of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) at day +180 were 14.7% and 4.2%, and the CuI of moderate/severe cGVHD at 2 years was 2.4% in the PTCy/Tac group and 41.8% (hazard ratio [HR], .29; P < .001), 15.8%, (HR, .24; P = .007), and 47.0% (HR, .05; P < .001), respectively, in the no-PTCy group. The duration of immunosuppression was shorter in patients receiving PTCy/Tac (6.2 months versus 9.0 months; P < .001). PTCy/Tac patients had higher OS (2 years: 74.3% versus 60.9%; HR, .54; P = .012), lower NRM (2 years: 8.6% versus 15.8%; HR, .54; P = .11), comparable CuI of relapse (2 years: 26.0% versus 24.4%; HR, 1.03; P = .89), and higher GRFS (2 years: 59.1% versus 16.7%; HR, .32; P < .001). Using PTCy/Tac in HLA-matched PB allo-HCT improved transplantation outcomes at out institution compared with previous prophylactic regimens, including a higher probability of survival despite more delayed engraftment and a higher rate of bacterial infection.

Effect of CD34+ Cell Dose on the Outcomes of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide.

The impact of infused CD34+ cell dose on outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) using standard graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis remains controversial. Information on this subject is scarce for alloHSCT using high-dose post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy). We aimed to assess the effect of CD34+ cell dose in peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts on the outcome of alloHSCT using PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis. To do so, we conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of 221 consecutive adult patients who underwent PTCy alloHSCT from HLA-matched sibling donors (MSDs; n = 22), HLA-matched unrelated donors (MUDs; n = 83), mismatched unrelated donors (MMUDs; n = 73), and haploidentical donors (n = 43). Based on the binary partitioning method, 5 × 106/kg was used as the optimal cutoff for CD34+ cell dose. According to our institutional protocol, the maximum CD34+ cell dose was capped at 8 × 106/kg. The study cohort was divided into 2 groups based on CD34+ cell dose: high dose (>5 to 8 × 106/kg) and low dose (≤5 × 106/kg). Patients receiving high-dose CD34+-containing grafts had significantly shorter median times to neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment compared to those who received low-dose CD34+ (19 days versus 21 days [P = .002] and 16 days versus 22 days [P = .04], respectively). There were no differences between the high-dose and low-dose groups in the cumulative incidence of day +100 acute GVHD (grade II-IV: 25% versus 23% [P = .7]; grade III-IV: 5% versus 4% [P = .4], respectively) or 2-year chronic GVHD (moderate/severe GVHD: 9% versus 6%; P = .5). There was no impact of CD34+ cell dose on survival outcomes with the use of MSDs, MUDs, or MMUDs. Recipients of haploidentical alloHSCT using low-dose CD34+ cells had significantly worse overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 6.01; P = .004) and relapse-free survival (HR, 4.57; P = .004). In recipients of PBSC PTCy alloHSCT, infused CD34+ cell doses >5 to 8 × 106/kg were associated with faster neutrophil and platelet engraftment, independent of donor type. Our study suggests an impact of CD34+ cell dose on survival outcomes only with haploidentical donors, for whom the administration of a CD34+ cell dose ≤5 × 106/kg significantly decreased survival outcomes.

PTCY and Tacrolimus for GVHD Prevention for Older Adults Undergoing HLA-Matched Sibling and Unrelated Donor AlloHCT.

The use of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) for graft-versus-host disease (GHVD) prevention is becoming prevalent in the transplantation community when HLA-identical sibling and 10/10 HLA-matched (MUD) and 9/10 mismatched unrelated donors are selected for alloHSCT. However, reported evidence on outcomes from elderly patients receiving PTCY-containing GVHD prophylaxis remains limited. This study aims to compare the outcomes of PTCY- tacrolimus (TK) prophylaxis and conventional GVHD prophylaxis in patients aged >50 years undergoing peripheral blood alloHSCT from a single institution. A total of 161 consecutive patients aged >50 years undergoing alloHSCT between January 2014 and February 2021 were included. Data were collected retrospectively and updated in December 2021. Patients received grafts from HLA-identical sibling, and from 10/10 and 9/10 HLA matched and mismatched unrelated donors. Overall, median age was 60 years, and 91 (54.8%) received PTCY-TK for GVHD prevention. Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was longer in the PTCY-TK group (20 versus 16 days and 19 versus 11 days, P < .001). The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) at day 100 and moderate/severe chronic GVHD (cGVHD) at 2 years were 18.2%, 5.7%, and 9.5% for patients receiving PTCY-TK, and 26.0%, 9.6% and 39.5% for those who did not. The multivariate analysis showed that PTCY-TK reduced the probability of grade II-IV aGVHD (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, P = .035), of cGVHD (any grade: HR 0.43 [P = .014], and of moderate/severe cGVHD [HR 0.15 {P < .001}]). At 2 years, the overall survival (65.4% versus 65.6%, P = .472), non-relapse mortality (17.4% versus 13.7%, P = .967), and cumulative incidence of relapse rates (24.2% versus 27.5%, P = .712) were comparable between both cohorts; GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was higher in the PTCY-TK group (2 years: 50.2% versus 21.8%; HR 0.42, P = .001). In patients aged ≥50 years. PTCY-TK was safe and a more effective drug combination than non-PTCY containing GVHD prophylaxis, even with the use of matched and mismatched unrelated donors, and resulted in comparable relapse rates and better GRFS.

Impact of severe acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: a retrospective single center analysis.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) increases early mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients and may accelerate chronic kidney disease (CKD) development. We analyzed prospective variables related to AKI and CKD in 422 allo-HCT recipients to establish risk factors of severe acute renal failure and CKD. Renal function and creatinine were periodically assessed from baseline till the last follow-up. Sixty-three patients (14%) developed severe AKI (AKI-3) at 100 days post transplant and 15% at 12 months. Variables associated with AKI-3 were age above 55 years [hazard ratio (HR): 2.4; p = 0.019], total body irradiation (TBI) (HR: 1.8; p = 0.044), high-risk cytomegalovirus reactivation (HR: 1.8; p = 0.041), and methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis (HR: 2.1; p = 0.024). AKI-3 increased the mortality risk (HR: 2.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.9-3.4). The CKD prevalence in 161 living patients was 10.2% at the last follow-up and in most, CKD developed 1 year post HCT, independent of AKI. The CKD at 1 year post HCT was associated with increased mortality (HR: 3.54; p < 0.001). Interestingly, pretransplant CKD was associated with early mortality (HR: 5.6; p < 0.001). In fact, pre- and posttransplant CKD had independent unfavorable long-term outcomes. These pretransplant factors can potentially be targeted to improve allo-HCT outcomes.

A reproducible and safe at-home allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant program: first experience in Central and Southern Europe.

In 2015, we implemented an at-home allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) program. Between 2015 and 2018, 252 patients underwent allo-HCT; 41 patients underwent allo-HCT in the at-home program (46% myeloablative; 63% unrelated donor; 32% posttransplant cyclophosphamide), and these patients were compared with 39 in-patients; safety, capacity to release beds for other programs, and economic efficiency cost were evaluated. We observed a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia in the at-home group compared with that in the in-patient group (32% versus 90%; p < 0.0001), whereas the incidence of aspergillosis was similar among groups (at-home 1% versus in-patient 3%; p = 0.5). The at-home patients showed a lower incidence of 1-year severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD; 10% versus 29%; p = 0.03). There were no differences in 1-year transplant-related mortality, relapse, or overall survival among groups. The re-admission rate in the at-home group was 7%. The at-home setting was less expensive (9087 €/transplant), and its implementation increased capacity by 10.5 allo-HCTs/year. Moreover, a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell program could be established without increasing beds. Thus, our at-home allo-HCT program may be a safe modality to reduce febrile neutropenia and acute GVHD, resulting in lower re-admission rates.

Improving security of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with light-chain amyloidosis.

Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has demonstrated to be an effective treatment for patients with light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. However, a high transplant-related mortality (TRM) rate was reported in previous series of patients and questioned the role of transplant in this disease. Recently, experienced groups have shown a significant TRM decrease that has been attributed to an accurate selection of patients. Moreover, application of several supportive measures has decreased toxicity over amyloid-involved organs. We analyzed a series of 66 patients with AL amyloidosis, who underwent ASCT at a single institution and evaluated the impact of these measures beyond patient selection. Four temporary groups were established: group-A (non-selection plus post-transplant G-CSF use) with 29 patients, group-B (selection) with 13, group-C (selection and G-CSF avoidance) with 14, and group-D (selection, G-CSF avoidance and corticosteroid's prophylaxis) with 10. A decreasing TRM was observed over time from group-A (38%), to group-D (0%); p = 0.02. We also observed a progressive increase of three-year OS from 62% in group-A to 100% in group-D; p = 0.049. On the multivariate analysis, cardiac involvement was the only independent predictor of survival. Therefore, tailored selection policy together with transplant supportive measures have allowed ASCT to be a safe procedure in AL amyloidosis.